What is Employment at Will?

What is Employment at Will?

Texas employment law attorney Chris McKinney discusses employment at will and wrongful termination in today's video.

Today’s video topic is what is employment at will and how will it affect my wrongful termination claim?

Read More

EEOC Pt. 1 - What and Why Do I Have to File with the EEOC?

EEOC Pt. 1 - What and Why Do I Have to File with the EEOC?

In today’s video, Texas employment lawyer Chris McKinney discusses the who, why, what, where, when of the EEOC. What's it all about? Do I have to file? What do I put in my filing?

Chris covers all of this and more in this video:

Read More

Filing an EEOC Charge - Who, What, Where, When and Why of Filing a Charge of Discrimination

Filing an EEOC Charge - Who, What, Where, When and Why of Filing a Charge of Discrimination

Many employees are not aware that before you can you file a lawsuit in court regarding an employment discrimination or employment retaliation case, you generally need to go through an administrative agency first. Typically that is the EEOC. Today, we are going to discuss the who, what, where, when, and why of filing an EEOC Charge of Discrimination.

Read More

How Do I Find An Employment Attorney?

Texas employment law attorney Chris McKinney discusses finding and hiring an employment lawyer.

So you need to hire an employment lawyer but you don’t know how to get started? Then this video is for you. Hiring an employment attorney to guide you through an employment-related dispute can be challenging.

For this reason it is important that you do some research and get your own materials together before you start making calls. Employment lawyer Chris McKinney Explains.

Black Employees at San Antonio Construction Company’s New York Worksite Were Subjected to Racist Insults and a Noose, Federal Agency Charges

San Antonio-based CCC Group, Inc. violated federal law when it fostered a work environment rife with racist comments and discriminatory work conditions, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed this month in New York State.

Read More

The Vanishing Jury Trial: Fifth Circuit Continues To Be A Difficult Place To Get A Jury Trial In Discrimination Cases

Juries are meant to be the conscious of the community. Jury trials are the purest form of democracy in action. They act as a pressure relief valve of sorts for society and allow the people to have a say in determining what is acceptable behavior and what is not. By preventing the vast majority of discrimination cases from ever getting to a jury, the courts are effectively plugging up society’s pressure relief valve. And eventually, if things continue down this road, that pressure is likely to blow up.

Read More

5th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Against Business Suing Another Business For Race Discrimination Under 42 U.S.C. 1981

The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of White Glove's racial discrimination claim, holding that White Glove did not need a racial identity to have standing to assert a 42 U.S.C. 1981 racial discrimination claim and White Glove has statutory standing to assert a section 1981 racial discrimination claim.

Read More

Report: Wage Theft Still Rampant In Texas’ Rio Grande Valley

San Antonio Express News has an investigative report out today covering the rampant wage theft that still takes place against produce workers in the Rio Grand Valley: Fair pay a distant dream for produce packers in Rio Grande Valley

For two years, Jorge Perez Hernandez worked 12 to 18 hours a day, six days a week, in a small refrigerated warehouse here. He sorted fruit and vegetables from Mexico and repackaged them for distribution in the U.S.

***

“I came in at 8 a.m. and I left at 11 p.m. or 12 at night, with an (unpaid) hour for lunch and dinner,” he said. “Six days a week.”

And when they complain or report being underpaid…

“Sometimes he’d carry the gun, put it on the table so we could see it there, to intimidate us,” Perez Hernandez recalled.

De La Fuente heard about their complaint and fired all six workers, Galvan said.

***

Employers have coached workers to lie to investigators about their pay and working conditions, and in some cases have fired them for cooperating, court records show. In one case, a packing company reported an undocumented worker to U.S. immigration authorities to retaliate against the man for talking to investigators, according to court records.

And, the workers get the message…

After Fuentes Farms fired them, five of the six workers who had complained to the commission dropped their cases. They feared being blacklisted in the industry — or worse, deported.

The government can’t keep up, even with help from excellent public interest firms like Texas RioGrande Legal Aid.

Experts largely agree that the Department of Labor doesn’t have the resources to stay on top of the situation. Many workers say speaking up often means becoming unemployable.

In this border region of Texas, many undocumented workers struggle to feed their families, being abused by American companies while staying under the radar to avoid deportation. What keeps them going is their dream for future generations.

“They want their children to be educated,” he said.

His oldest child is 15, a sophomore in high school. Like his parents, he is undocumented. Unlike them, he speaks both English and Spanish. When he grows up, he wants to be a lawyer.

State of Michigan Hammered with a $11 Million Dollar Verdict in Race and Retaliation Case

Genesee County Courthouse

Genesee County Courthouse

A Michigan jury awarded more than $11 million this month to a husband-and-wife pair who sued the Michigan Department of Corrections, alleging claims of race discrimination, hostile work environment and retaliation.

A six-member all-white jury delivered its unanimous verdict after a six-week trial that included 41 witnesses and hinged on allegations of racial discrimination and retaliation. The plaintiff alleged that she was racially harassed on a daily basis including being called 'Mammy', (being) asked if she wanted chitlins on her pizza, called the "black one" in her all-white office, and told she was not wanted in the all-white office. She also claimed she was put into life-threatening situations after complaining about racism.

The plaintiff had worked for the state for 19 years. Because of the work environment, the plaintiff transferred to another office, but she said the race discrimination and retaliation continued. Her husband also was allegedly forced to retire from his job as a deputy warden when phony disciplinary charges were brought against him. The jury awarded the plaintiff $5.1 million and her husband $6.25 million.

Read More: Detroit News

Learn More About Racial Discrimination and Retaliation